Wednesday, March 18, 2009

New Deal or Raw Deal: In Review

 

Armed with objective statistics, eye witness accounts of those in the state department, as well those so called brains trust confidants, Burton Folsom’s New Deal or Raw Deal exposes FDR, his failed New Deal policies, his social engineering, and his lust to centralize power in Washington, as the primary causes that turned the depression into the great depression.

 

Folsom dispels the liberal myth that capitalism caused the depression; he lays the blame at the feet of a culpable government, for national debt, the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act, and the Federal Reserve were the primary causes of the depression. Reading this book one witnesses the birth of big government, and the disastrous causality the New Deal inflicted on the marketplace, furthermore; one sees how big government legislates entitlements and favor empowering special interest peddlers and lobbyists to change our nation forever.

 

Folsom paints Roosevelt as a charmer, one endowed not only with a silver spoon in his mouth, but one with charisma and the gift of oration. It’s unfortunate that Roosevelt never succeeded in anything remotely entrepreneurial outside of politics, his attempts at business and law all ended in abysmal failures; is it any wonder, his new deal policies would suffer the same fate?

 

We learn from the onset of this book that FDR invented the role of presidential duplicity; he campaigned on tariff reform, promised to balance the budget, and promised tax cuts for all. After two terms in office he reneged on all of it. Instead of a balanced budget he doubled the national dept, delivered a 79% top tax bracket, invented the only undistributed profits tax in the world, and raped the forgotten man with excise taxes.

 

During those years of national crisis, with unemployment above 20%, FDR attacked the successful business men and the wealthiest Americans with rancor. Imposing burdensome taxes on production and profits, compromising their ability to invest, grow, and create jobs. He prescribed to the flawed theory of underconsumption, imposing minimum wage legislation that put many out of work, created gender and racial discrimination enhancing class warfare. When he ran short of affluent victims, He levied an excise tax, which hit the low and middle class, when excise revenues outnumbered income tax revenues; Roosevelt discovered a new windfall to fund his New Deal projects.

 

Folsom demonstrates how patronage kept Roosevelt in office for three terms. Roosevelt wielded his government tax fortune to favor those loyal democrats with projects for their states, precincts, and constituencies. He targeted questionable states he couldn’t carry, bought political favors, created pork barrel projects for democrats loyal to his policies and bought votes. He influenced gubernatorial races, senate races, and congressional races, all in an effort to centralize power in Washington.

 

Roosevelt spoke publicly of how political power needed to be centralized, and chastised those Supreme Court judges who opposed him. He tried to stack the Supreme Court with judges favorable to his New Deal, when that failed; he tried to skew the vote by adding more justices to the bench.

 

He often sic the IRS, like an attack dog on political rivals and fellow democrats that opposed his New Deal, the loudest dissenters where subject to harassing audits and jail time. With blatant disregard for the first amendment, he created the FCC to attack the opposition with radio censorship.

 

If anything Roosevelt’s legacy is one of influence, of charisma and power, duplicity and corruption. Let us not forget Roosevelt’s affection for socialism, and the communist sympathizers he appointed to his cabinet, not to mention his brains trust.

 

This begs the question, if this is true about Roosevelt, the man and his policies, then why is he still hailed as one of the greatest presidents of all time? The answer lies in the altruistic nature of his presidency; he was perceived as caring, his intentions sincere, his message one of hope and promise to right the financial disparity in America by wealth redistribution. The rights prescribed by the forefathers weren’t enough for the man of sincerity; he had to add “A right to a comfortable living.” In 1944 he added an Economic Bill of Rights that included “the right to a useful and remunerative job . . . The right of every family to a decent home . . . The right to a good education.” Alas the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

 

So the altruists are responsible for this unwarranted praise, the statists, the socialist, the liberal intelligentsia, nurtured in our bastions of higher education. To this day big government perpetuates these myths of failed social ideologies and flawed philosophical doctrine, with generous government funding. If you awoke tomorrow and discovered you spent your entire life, your entire carrier, promoting a failed ideology, an unsustainable socialist doctrine, would you discard it, or cling to it, defending it with all your immoral rectitude? Here in lies the answer.

 

This book is a great read, especially now as history repeats itself. The uncanny resemblance of Obamanomics and Roosevelt’s New Deal legacy is frightening. Read this book, juxtapose these two administrations, and you will be able to predict with certainty the future of our economy, our government, and our freedom.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Iron Wok Jan (Volume 2), by Shinji Saijyo

After reading and reviewing Iron Wok Jan (Volume 1), I decided to continue the series in an attempt to determine whether or not this one is a keeper.

Story overview:

Jan (the obnoxious trainee with great cooking skills) goes on a camping trip with Takao (the not so obnoxious trainee, but without the great cooking skills). After working his magic on some quail (and an old chicken that Takao fond), Jan shares that his desire for cooking comes from a promise he made to his grandfather.

Back at the restaurant, Jan humiliates the arrogant food critic, Nichido Otani, yet again, which causes the man to seek for a way to destroy Jan’s name. An idea occurs to Nichido, and so he assembles “The First National Young Adult Chinese Cuisine Cooking Contest” (whew, can that get any longer??). His hope is that a greater chef will emerge and put Jan in his place. Meanwhile, Kiriko (the granddaughter of the Gobancho Restaurant owner, and trainee), seeks to discover a way to sculpt a radish on her own, determined not to accept help from anyone.

When the cooking contest starts, Jan surprises the judges by drugging them with a soup made from “Magic Mushrooms”. Kiriko thinks this is morally wrong and shows her distain by punching Jan right in the face. Nonetheless, they both make it to the second round of the contest and only Volume 3 will tell us what happens next.

My thoughts:

I’m not ready to call it a keeper, but I can say that it’s starting to grow on me. The characters are not black and white and there’s potential to see a lot more depth in them. Also, the recipes have not ceased to be ever more intriguing.

Things to consider:

Thirteen and up, just as the last one, and geared more towards boys. There are a few shots of Kiriko, wearing a little less than appropriate outfit at her home, but nothing extremely inappropriate.

Opportunities for discussion:

The theme of motivation continues strong, yet I would add that this may be a good time to talk to your kids about drugs, as Jan uses mushrooms for a recipe, and as mentioned, Kiriko thinks this is wrong to the extreme.

Monday, March 16, 2009

2008 "National Book Critics Circle" Award Winners Announced (Mas Bolano)

The awards for the late Roberto Bolaño and 2666 keep rolling in:

“On Thursday, March 12, 2009, at a crowded ceremony at the New School in New York, the National Book Critics Circle announced the winners of its book awards, covering books published in 2008. . . .

“Roberto Bolaño’s monumental 2666 (Farrar, Straus), a tale of love and violence set within the framework of the fictional town of Santa Teresa, Mexico, that’s widely regarded as the late author’s masterpiece, won the fiction award. Fiction committee chair Marcela Valdes called the work ‘a virtuoso accomplishment that ranks with Moby-Dick and Blood Meridian as one of the trenchant and kaleidoscopic examinations of evil in fiction.’”

Other winners included:

  • Poetry (co-winners): August Kleinzahler, Sleeping It Off in Rapid City; Juan Felipe Herrera, Half the World in Light

  • Criticism: Seth Lerer, Children’s Literature: A Reader’s History from Aesop to Harry Potter

  • Biography: Patrick French, The World Is What It Is: The Authorized Biography of V.S. Naipaul

  • Autobiography: Ariel Sabar, My Father’s Paradise: A Son’s Search for His Jewish Past in Kurdish Iraq

  • Nonfiction: Dexter Filkins, The Forever War.

(more @ National Book Critics Circle)

Related: Mas Bolano: Part VI of “2666″ Discovered in Author’s Papers

Next Generation Leader: Five Essentials For Those Who Will Shape The Future by Andy Stanley

I am becoming a fan of the ministry of Andy Stanley. We stumbled across his DVD course ‘Parental Guidance Required’ which, in my humble opinion, is better than ‘Visionary Parenting’. I have previewed for our church another DVD course ‘i marriage’ which is very, very good.

On the basis of this I got some of his books. This was the first one I read. And I was not disappointed.

This book is a very good addition to any leadership reading library. It deals with five areas of leadership - Competence - do less, accomplish more; Courage - courage establishes leadership; Clarity - uncertainty demands clarity; Coaching - coaching enables a leader to go farther, faster; Character - character determines the leaders legacy.

There is great wisdom in this book which is very easy to read and has enough (not too much) testimony. Andy Stanley’s suggestions are radical, and biblical and powerful. He is so strong on integrity and morality and he emphasizes that as a leader you must hold onto your integrity even at the cost of your reputation - or opportunities to advance. 

This really must be on the core reading list of leadership books on courses and this will be one of the books read by any future intern of mine.

Let me leave you with a quote which I hope will give you a taste of this book:

As a next generational leader you need to build a moral perimeter around your behavior too. You must come to grips with the fact that, ultimately, success is defined in terms of who you are and how you treat the people around you. To charge off in the direction of the task without first determining who you want to be and how you plan to treat those who choose to follow is tantamount to running from home plate to third base. And as my friend Kevin Myers says, the only time that’s funny is in little league. In leadership it is a short cut that short circuits legacy.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Editorial Campana Event!

Editorial Campana is pleased to announce another event!!

Monday March 16th, 4:00-5:15 p.m. This event is bilingual English/Spanish B.M.C.C. (Borough of Manhattan Community College): Room: S-605. Reading and conversation with Sonia Rivera Valdés (Casa de las Américas Award winner) author of Stories of Little Women and Grown-Up Girls (Historias de mujeres grandes y Chiquitas)

For more information please visit Editorial Campana or the BMCC website. Also look for future events hosted by Editorial Campana!

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Review: MEIN KAMPF by Adolf Hitler [Magistra Mater]

Carol from Magistra Mater recently reviewed Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.  Here’s an excerpt:

I agree with Mussolini who called it ‘Hitler’s boring book‘.  Hitler considered himself a gifted orator.  He was no writer.  It was hard to follow his circular logic.  Much of his rhetoric was vitriol and vituperation.  Frankly, it was agony to read.  My husband could not understand my compulsion to make it through to the end.

Read the entire review here.

**Attention participants:  remember to email us a link to your reviews, and we’ll post them here so we can see what everyone is reading!**

Friday, March 13, 2009

Book Review: This is Your Brain on Music, by Daniel J. Levitin

Before I begin, let me just say right off that I enjoyed reading this book a whole lot and I heartily recommend it. The following harsh criticism is partly because I care enough to wish it was just a bit better, and partly because its subject matter falls in my own general area of expertise (psychology), so I’m bound to be nitpicky.

This is Your Brain on Music explores the science behind music, drawing from the latest research in psychology and neuroscience to explore various facets of creating and listening to it. After reviewing some basic information about music and music theory (most of which was new to me), Levitin begins describing the science behind topics such as categorization of music, the role of emotion in music, and musical expertise.

My first beef with the book is in its accuracy. Vague hypotheses and tentative research findings are often presented as established fact. However, this is to be expected in any science book written for a popular audience (again, me being a nitpicky psychologist). But there are other little errors. Levitin briefly mentions that Canadian psychologist Glenn Schellenberg was an original member of the popular 80s band Martha and the Muffins. However, a bit of Googling reveals that Schellenberg seems to have only played a guest role on a later album of theirs.

This only caught my attention because I’m currently running a study that Schellenberg kindly provided some audio files for. And speaking of name dropping, Levitin devotes many words to telling us how many famous people he has chilled with. At one point, he suddenly goes from talking about the role of the cerebellum in music to an elaborate tale of how he attended conferences with all his scientist heroes and even met Watson and Crick. This autobiographical stuff is interesting enough, but it ruins the flow - the rhythm, if you will - of the scientific stuff when the two are discordantly mashed together.

This haphazard organization is also exemplified in the book’s final chapter. During a discussion of music’s primary role in human evolution that is finally starting to lead somewhere, Levitin suddenly jumps to a vague hypothesis about mirror neurons fueling cultural evolution, then jumps again to a rambling, repetitive paragraph that pretty much says “humans live in groups” 5 times in 5 slightly different ways, and then, the book ends. No real final thought; no paragraph even trying to tie the preceding chapters together, just a random stopping point when he ran out of facts and anecdotes to throw onto the page.

Did I mention I liked this book? While it may be a disorganized collection of facts about music, each fact is fascinating on its own and well worth reading about. We often fail to think very much about the music we listen to for hours each day, and This is Your Brain on music, while it could use improvement, is an eye opening exploration of the deeper layers of the magical human experience that is music.

Side note: In this post, I wondered about the underlying reason for certain musical conventions. For example, why do minor chords sounds sad? Is it arbitrary and cultural? Or is there a more concrete reason? This book answers some of those questions. Long story short, like usual, it’s both. The laws of physics are responsible for some combinations of sounds going well together, but arbitrary choices and conventions also play a large role. E.g., apparently not every culture thinks minor chords sound sad. Interesting stuff.

Waiting for the Light to Change

The book doesn’t do what I thought it did in my earlier comment. It’s not just cultural Mormonism; there’s a very lovely Wyoming pioneer epiphany at the end. Sarah, the protagonist, both hits rock bottom and is redeemed/strengthened by God. I wonder if there would have been a way to show more of her faith earlier on, without destroying the pain Annette Haws worked to create. I don’t know. It was a really great book though, and one I never would have picked up based on its cover or even dust jacket (sorry, Cedar Fort). So I’m grateful to the Whitneys for introducing me to it. I’m going to see if I can get my book group to discuss it.

The book is a redemptive tragedy, and I would call it Shakespearean except to be candid my memory of the last time I really studied Shakespeare is fuzzy, and I don’t recall all the elements of a perfect Greek/Shakespearean tragedy. But great stuff, though. Recommended.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Concubine's Tattoo

Rowland, Laura Joh. The Concubine’s Tattoo. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.

In addition to being a great 17th century Japanese murder mystery The Concubine’s Tattoo is a commentary on honor and relationships. Sano Ichirois the shogun’s investigator who has recently celebrated an arranged marriage. In both his professional and personal life Sano must balance a code of conduct that is morally, politically and, of course, honorably sound. Sano’s latest case (on the night of his wedding no less) is the murder of the shogun’s favorite concubine. Entwined in this murder are complications concerning an heir, long standing cultural differences and rivalries. Rowland displays Sano’s progress on the case through the eyes of Sano’s new wife Reiko, his enemy Chamberlain Yanagisawa, his partner Hirata, and Sano himself as well as many other fascinating characters. One of the best enjoyments of Rowland’s book is her vivid, descriptive use of imagery. The details are so sensuous and alluring. They exquisitely cater to all five senses. Here are two quotes I particularly liked, “Her voice was a husky murmur that insinuated its way into Hirata’s mind like a dark, intoxicating smoke” (p 86), and “The cold air had a lung-saturating dampness” (p 166). 

One other detail I thought I should point out - Rowland is not afraid to describe vivid sex scenes of varying natures. Man on man, woman on woman, husband and wife, illicit seductions, and even rape. The scenes while reminiscent of lusty bodice-rippers are not overly flowery or “heaving.”

BookLust Twist: In More Book Lust in the chapter called, “Crime is a Globetrotter: China” (p 60).

book review of HUNTED, House of Night book 5

Download wallpaper

HUNTED: House of Night Series #5 

by P. C. Cast/Kristin Cast 

Buy from our Amazon IF store

Read or Download Chapter One (PDF)

Read Chapter One online (HTML)

Click Here to Listen to Chapter Two

IF Score: 4 stars   This was one of my most anticipated book this year and I have to admit I was a bit disappointed but I still really enjoyed it.  I’ll probably like it more the second time through but I don’t think this one lives up to its potential.  P. C. Cast introduces new characters and scenerios with a lot of promise but then never does much with them, at least not compared with things I began to anticipate each time.  She apparently had three major things planned for Zoey and the gang to accomplish (move, face Kalona, save someone) and the rest was filler.  I never felt that with the first four books but I read them back to back and this is the first one I had to wait a while for.  So maybe my anticipation affected my expectations negatively and perhaps no one could have lived up to them?

My primary disappointment was no deepening of relations with Erik or  Heath and no closure either - just more of the same.  I’m very happy with most everything that passes between Zoey and Stark but I would have liked something more before the book was over.  I understand the reasons for leaving it questionable though.  That’s why it still gets four stars even though I was disappointed overall.  Even the big bad fallen angel Kalona doesn’t live up to his potential as a scary powerful provacative underworld kind of character. 

Neither Kalona or Neferet seem villanous enough to Zoey or the “nerd herd” after all they’ve been through in the past.  Since dream encounters were introduced in the first chapter I expected more than two or at least that they would be more intimidating, intensifying her fears or temptations each time.  Zoey spends more time thinking about Kalona’s intentions and what to make of him, than actually interacting with him. That is actually true for the whole story generally.  We read more about her thoughts than her real experiences — or maybe that’s my imagination? 

 In truth, this story was more like a mystery novel this time than a paranormal vampire romance.  There was more clue finding, mystery solving and strategy planning and less character development and personal interactions.  I have to wonder if Cast developed the story further and her editor ripped pages out in an effort to ensure its YA rating? (If so I hope she’ll post some of that on her website later, like deleted scenes in a movie.) Overall, Zoey seemed to have none of her past struggles with her powers, friends, or the guys in her life, and oddly enough, not even with lust or bloodlust, just her feelings.

Zoeys acts like her virgin self again only with less sensual hunger than before (though most people find it harder to resist lust once the appetite is awakened and virginity has been given consentually)  I can’t understand her avoiding even being caressed sensually by any of the guys in her life after all this time.  That’s just not cool five books into a series like this that’s been hotter in past novels with the same people.  Cast places Zoey into several situations with “guy heat” that Zoey basically runs from and is surprised by even from guys she’s been in relationships with before. I AM glad she has learned over time to say no to bloodlust and guys pulling her into repeat situations.  But its odd that she struggles more with who to be with than how to be with them, or should I say how much to be with any of them, especially since she’s “been there and done that” now and knows it can be amazing.  It just doesn’t work for me that Zoey doesn’t long for anyone but isn’t strong enough to choose someone to commit to and stay that way.  She does have a rational thought near the end that might explain it though so I’ll read it again.  I can see it if the whole problem is that none of them is truly fulfilling.  I guess that’s why we all still want chocolate after a full meal.  Sometimes we think we’re hungry even though we’ve been gorging, but nothing we’ve eaten has satisfied us.

I was also disappointed in how little the storyline developed around several new and interesting red fledgling characters introduced at the beginning but never encountered again later.  This book is obviously more of a “between” book than her others were.  It reminds me of the second Matrix movie that pretty much just tied the others together. Still…  I am hooked on the series and (unfortunately) await the next book… to bring me a little more closure or fulfillment.  I will read this book a couple more times to help me feel like I got my hardcover money’s worth.  On that note I should mention the cover art is intricately stunningly awesome.  Now that I know what will and won’t happen I will probably enjoy the story better the second time through (like the movie Twilight!) 

Your comments are welcome!  How did you feel about the story? Did it meet your expectations? What was your favorite part? What would you change?  What are you looking forward to in the next book?  (please type **SPOILER ALERT** as needed)

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

If You Think You’re Good, You Should Think Again

Are you a good person?

The proper answer to that question is, of course, “Go away.”

But you might reply that it depends on how one defines the word good. In a world of easily identified devils — Osama bin Laden, Kim Jong-Il, Bernard Madoff — most of us feel we’re basically on the side of the angels. We work hard, pay our bills, try to raise our children well, volunteer a bit here and there and, when in doubt, abide by the golden rule. (Don’t we?) Why not give ourselves the benefit of the doubt?

Peter Singer’s new book about world poverty, “The Life You Can Save,” is here to tell us that we aren’t, most of us, the people we think we are. On a planet full of so much obvious and widespread suffering, he writes, “there is something deeply askew with our widely accepted views about what it is to live a good life.”

Mr. Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University and perhaps America’s most famous specialist in applied ethics, has made a career out of making people feel uncomfortable. His best-known book, “Animal Liberation” (1975), is among the founding texts of the contemporary animal-rights movement. He has been working out the ideas in “The Life You Can Save” since at least 1972, when he published his influential essay “Famine, Affluence and Morality.”

Mr. Singer is far from the world’s only serious thinker about poverty, but with “The Life You Can Save” he becomes, instantly, its most readable and lapel-grabbing one. This book is part rational argument, part stinging manifesto, part handbook. It’s a volume that suggests, given that 18 million people are dying unnecessarily each year in developing countries, that there is a “moral stain on a world as rich as this one.” We are not doing enough to help our fellow mortals.

Human beings have an intuitive belief that we should help others in need, Mr. Singer writes, “at least when we can see them and when we are the only person in a position to save them.” But we need to go beyond these intuitions, Mr. Singer declares. And so, early in “The Life You Can Save,” he proposes the following logical argument, one I’ll quote in full:

“First premise: Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad.

Second premise: If it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing anything nearly as important, it is wrong not to do so.

Third premise: By donating to aid agencies, you can prevent suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care, without sacrificing anything nearly as important.

Conclusion: Therefore, if you do not donate to aid agencies, you are doing something wrong.”

To reject this argument, Mr. Singer writes, “you need to find a flaw in the reasoning.”

It’s pretty tempting to try to toss Mr. Singer’s argument back in his face. The counterarguments well up in your mind: The economy is tanking. Charity begins at home. I work hard for my money. Charity breeds dependency. Some charity groups waste too much money on overhead. And doesn’t everyone hate a do-gooder? (In a 2008 Reuters poll, Madonna was voted the least-liked celebrity do-gooder. Mr. Singer strongly defends her.)

Mr. Singer convincingly dismisses these counterarguments, and his logical conclusion above is well-nigh irrefutable. Helping the world’s poor will bring “meaning and purpose” to our lives, he suggests, through financial adjustments that will mostly “make no difference to your well-being.”

In his book, which began as a series of lectures at Oxford University and as an article for The New York Times Magazine, Mr. Singer praises many people who give away as much as 50 percent of their annual income. For the rest of us, he proposes a more realistic approach: “Roughly 5 percent of annual income for those who are financially comfortable, and rather more for the very rich.”

(Maybe you’re asking yourself, as I did: Am I “financially comfortable”? My mortgage, my credit-card bills and my other debts scream no. But the $3 coffee I’m drinking while I type this, and the Lucinda Williams concert tickets I just bought, tell me there is wiggle room in my budget.)

Some of Mr. Singer’s contentions are harder to stomach. “Philanthropy for the arts or for cultural activities is, in a world like this one, morally dubious,” he declares. The Metropolitan Museum of Art bought a painting by Duccio in 2004 for more than $45 million, an amount, Mr. Singer says, that would pay for cataract operations on 900,000 blind or near-blind people in the developing world.

He continues: “If the museum were on fire, would anyone think it right to save the Duccio from the flames, rather than a child?”

You can agree with him in general while suggesting — to give just one example — that society was ennobled rather than hurt, during the Great Depression, by the money the Works Progress Administration, while not a philanthropy, spent on drama, literature and arts projects.

Mr. Singer’s book has its heroes and villains. Among the former are Bill Gates and, interestingly, James Hong, who became a millionaire after founding the fluky Web site Hot or Not, where people’s looks are rated by strangers. Mr. Hong donates 10 percent of every dollar he makes over $100,000 each year, and he runs a different Web site encouraging others to make the same pledge.

Among the villains of “The Life You Can Save” are the software billionaires Paul Allen and Larry Ellison. Mr. Singer concedes that Mr. Ellison gave away $39 million in 2007. But he adds, “If Ellison never earned another dollar, he could give away $39 million every year for the next 600 years and still have more than $1 billion as a cushion for his old age.”

There is time for Mr. Ellison. As Mr. Singer points out, if Warren Buffett had given away the first million he’d made, he would not be in a position now to be giving $31 billion away. But most of us are never going to be Warren Buffett.

On one of Mr. Singer’s Web sites, thelifeyoucansave.com, he asks people to sign up to donate to world poverty along the sliding scale he proposes. (He himself gives away about 25 percent of his annual income, he writes.) So far there are more than 800 names.

“We tend to think that people are more to blame for their acts,” Mr. Singer observes, “than for their omissions.” You don’t have to agree with everything in “The Life You Can Change” to feel that there’s no real debate: When it comes to living the so-called “good” life, one’s moral omissions count more than ever.

__________

Full article and photo (Peter Singer): http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/books/11garn.html

'Vanished Smile: The Mysterious Theft of Mona Lisa' -- Partial Verdict

Picasso used “a rusty frying pan for a chamber pot,” R. A. Scotti says in Vanished Smile: The Mysterious Theft of Mona Lisa (Knopf, April 2009), her new book about the 1911 theft of the painting from the Louvre. I’ve been reading this fascinating historical true-crime story to distract myself from the crimes against literature committed by some of the Delete Key Awards finalists. And based on the first 75 pages: Fans of The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher, this is your book.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

 

White Witch, Black Curse by Kim Harrison

 

My rating: @@@

 

White Witch, Black Curse is the latest release out in the Rachel Morgan series by Kim Harrison.  I just finished it over the weekend. 

If you’re already into the series, you’ll want to read it - like me - to see what happens next to some of your favourite characters.  Let me save you some of the suspense.  Rachel’s actions get her into further trouble. 

Best: Kisten’s murderer is revealed and that part of Rachel’s history is wrapped up.  It’s an emotional moment.  Worst: Rachel continues to do things which isolate her from the community around her and get her involved in things she probably shouldn’t get involved with.

Kim Harrison always spins a good tale.  I wasn’t bored.  But neither was I compelled to pick up the book and read it through in one sitting.  Maybe it was the book and maybe it was my headspace last week, but I suspect it was the book more than anything else.  IMO, Ms. Harrison is starting to lose the energy of the story line - something that often happens after the third or fourth book in a series.  Ivy is less compelling.  Jenks is dealing with the worsening health of his partner Matalina.  Rachel faces some mild sibling disapproval issues and the reality of her mother finally moving on - both emotionally and physically - after many years of mourning.  Al pops up and is entertaining.  There’s a banshee sub-plot that creates some tension.  And once again, Rachel makes some weird and vague emotional decisions when it comes to her love life - such as it is.

I’m really not sure where Harrison can or will go from here with these characters.  As far as I can tell, the next book will involve Rachel getting involved with a former ghost/witch/runner (sigh) and Jenks will probably have to lay the mother of his offspring to rest.  Ivy will do what Ivy does.  Maybe there will be more fun with Trent who was relatively absent from this book.  

I’m glad I read it because I’m already invested in these characters.  And it was well written.  It just didn’t grab me the way the earlier books in this series did.  Jenks’ insights rang a little hollow, and the consistent evidence of Rachel’s bad choices when it comes to her non-business relationships just kept being reinforced in a far too obvious way.

Sure, I’ll pick up the next book.  But maybe I’ll wait a bit longer after it comes out to get it … and maybe, just maybe, I’ll wait for the paperback edition.

Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez

Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez, the UFW and the Struggle for Justice in the 21st. Century.

by Chris Tiedemann

National Lawyers Guild Bay Area Chapter.

During the 1960s and 1970s, many of the new generation’s best legal

minds were staff attorneys for the United Farmworkers of America (UFW).

Led by Jerry Cohen, the UFW’s legal team continually out-strategized

big growers; the latter had the best attorneys money could buy, but the UFW had brilliant lawyers who could not be bought. Randy Shaw, a longtime Bay Area attorney and Director of the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, acknowledges the accomplishments of these UFW attorneys in his new book from the University of California Press, Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez, the UFW and the Struggle for Justice in the 21st Century.

Beyond the Fields reveals the untold story of how the legacy of Cesar

Chavez - and the strategies and tactics of the UFW in its heyday -

continue to set the course for today’s social justice movements. It

also traces for the first time how UFW alumni have played leading roles in these movements.

Beyond the Fields follows in the tradition of Howard Zinn’s

People’s History of the United States, by providing little known

history about the UFW, its organizing tactics and its profound legacy on political activism in America over the past four decades. The book

provides a historic overview of the UFW, its leaders - particularly

Chavez - its achievements, and the lasting impact of tactics developed and used by the UFW on organizing around the country. Many of the stories of post-UFW social justice struggles in Beyond the Fields are riveting, including a description of the Justice for Janitors campaign in Miami and a history of the national immigrant rights movement. Shaw describes how a key building block for this movement was the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride in 2003, an event in which the National Lawyers Guild played an important role.

The book is particularly timely because of the use of UFW organizing

strategies in the ground game to elect Barack Obama. Shaw traces the roots of Obama’s vaunted field campaign back to the organizing genius of Fred Ross, who recruited and mentored Chavez during the 1950s, and whose voter outreach strategies became part of the UFW during the 1960s.

Shaw shows how the UFW’s voter registration and “get out the vote”

drives for Robert Kennedy in 1968, and for the California state ballot

initiatives in 1972 and 1976, trained a generation of activists in how

to win elections through grassroots organizing. UFW alums, including

Marshall Ganz and Miguel Contreras, then took the UFW electoral model beyond the fields, expanding Latino voting to transform politics in Los Angeles, California, and now the nation.

Shaw lists many of the UFW attorneys who worked for justice after

leaving the union, and discusses their post-UFW positions. He also

describes why Jerry Cohen and most of his legal team left the UFW, and how growers conspired to deny Cohen a seat on the Court of Appeal.

Shaw notes that one of his goals in writing the book was to rectify the

lack of public recognition of UFW veterans, and to give them thanks for their years of fighting for social justice. His book fulfills that goal.

Great as it will be to have Obama in the White House, Obama’s election isn’t a magic solution to the country’s many and deep social

problems. Shaw’s book provides valuable history to guide activists in

the battles to come, and is an inspiring read.

For more information about the book, see http://beyondthefields.net.

Additional commentary from Duane Campbell. Talking Union.

The book is excellent and deserves a read. The sections of this book on the immigrant rights movement are weak (in terms of how and why the AFL-CIO position changed). They over state the role of Eliseo Medina, without mentioning that he is a DSA Honorary Chair, and understate the role of 20 years of organizing by Bert Corona and the folks around Hermandad Mexicana. The author is very generous to SEIU and Medina. The author also understates the issue that many of the people portrayed as pro-immigrant activists in the book went on to support the big guest worker/enforcement bills of the last few years. This is particularly a problem with the folks working within and near SEIU. This division within the unions remains today.

See Origins of the Obama Organization.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Review: Even Now by Karen Kingsbury

Even Now                   

By: Karen Kingsbury

Zondervan, 2005

 

Even Now by Karen Kingsbury tackles some tough issues in modern society.  It is well written with gripping characters. It is Christian fiction that doesn’t come across as old fashioned or outdated. The characters don’t live in a perfect world. They aren’t saints and they don’t always do the right thing. In fact, bad choices are what lead to the original problem and a lack of faith perpetuates the tragedy.

Lauren Anderson and Shane Galanter grew up together. They were the children of best friends Angela and Sheila. The families were close for many years. The husbands shared a business, the wives shared friendship and secrets and they all shared dinners, vacations and a church home. Lauren and Shane were friends as they went off to elementary school.  They later shared their first kiss and eventually became high school sweethearts. They had their whole future planned out. It was almost time for their senior year and then it would be high school graduation. This would be followed by summer jobs before heading off to college. After college they would have their wedding, settle into careers and then start a family.  That was exactly what they wanted and what everyone who knew them expected. When Lauren turned up pregnant at the age of 17 their plans went askew. They shared the news with their horrified parents who worried a bit too much about appearances and their own standing in the community. The teens vowed to get married and raise the baby but it seemed both families were against that. Both sets of parents intervened and worked to separate the two. Where lies and trickery begin heartache and loss are sure to follow. This is a story of lost love, lost family and lost faith. It is also a story of true love, finding family and rekindling faith.

Shane gave Lauren an engagement ring and they vowed to love each other forever no matter what.  Lauren toyed with the idea of adoption but as the new life grew within her she decided to keep the baby. Shane chose the name Emily for their baby girl. When Lauren was eight months into the pregnancy Shane’s parents forced him to move with them across the country. In the age before cell phones or my space the teens lost track of each other because both families moved at the same time. As agreed ahead of time neither set of parents registered a listed phone number.  Lauren and Shane spent countless hours trying to reconnect. Once baby Emily was born Lauren took off on a cross country trip to locate Shane. When the baby got sick Lauren reluctantly turned around and went home. She sat by the hospital bed and prayed for a miracle. After an exhausting night she was given incorrect information and believed that Emily’s tiny body was not able to fight off the illness and that she did not survive. Lauren felt like a failure as a mother yet at the same time she was furious with her own parents. Rather than turn to them for comfort and what would have been the truth about her baby she bolts. She felt she could never forgive their deceptions and lies, which led to the loss of Shane.  Now she also blamed them in part for the loss of Emily. She also blamed God for not answering her desperate bedside prayer. The second time she left town she never looked back. She headed off to find Shane but along the way she changed her name, graduated from college and became a journalist. She made her own way in the world for the next twenty years.  It is grown up Emily raised by her grandparents who works to find her parents and reunite them with her grandparents and with each other.

The reconciliation with her parents is bittersweet due to a serious illness of one family member.  Lauren’s reunion with Shane was anticipated and hoped for but not without its problems. As a journalist Lauren spoke out against the war while Shane trained fighter pilots for the war. In their time apart Shane found a deep faith while Lauren turned her back on God. Their love remained but they had changed. Could that young love possibly sustain them now that they were on different sides in a war?

The story has some twists and turns that will keep the readers guessing. There are some tender moments that endear the characters. The author interjects scripture, which I found comforting.  The story introduces opposing views on War but not all readers will agree with the political viewpoint expressed in the book.  In addition there were a few scenarios that seemed to be a bit of a stretch. Lauren’s parents had searched for her for 20 years and had even hired private detectives all to no avail. Then suddenly Emily finds her mother almost effortlessly with the use of an old journal and the internet.  Skeptics might wonder how Shane, a top fighter pilot and Lauren, a journalist for Time magazine never stumbled upon any information about each that would have lead them back together.  Although I kind of wondered about this after the fact, it didn’t strike me as a problem while reading because the author did a nice job of detailing why they didn’t reconnect. Miscommunication, lack of information and multiple moves helped the story unfolded in a believable way. I guess you could chalk it up to destiny. We aren’t the master’s of our own fate. We can work and scheme and try but often things don’t fall into place until it is the right time. I find this to be true in my life and it was true for Shane and Lauren.

Even Now is a story of forgiveness and the power of love. As the book ends the story continues. The characters are on the road to relationship renewal but lingering issues remain even into the last chapter. Story events do not reach a conclusion, which leaves readers eager to read the sequel Ever After. 

Pearl